↓ Skip to main content

Recycling of E-Cadherin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
452 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recycling of E-Cadherin
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, July 1999
DOI 10.1083/jcb.146.1.219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tam Luan Le, Alpha S. Yap, Jennifer L. Stow

Abstract

E-Cadherin plays critical roles in many aspects of cell adhesion, epithelial development, and the establishment and maintenance of epithelial polarity. The fate of E-cadherin once it is delivered to the basolateral cell surface, and the mechanisms which govern its participation in adherens junctions, are not well understood. Using surface biotinylation and recycling assays, we observed that some of the cell surface E-cadherin is actively internalized and is then recycled back to the plasma membrane. The pool of E-cadherin undergoing endocytosis and recycling was markedly increased in cells without stable cell-cell contacts, i.e., in preconfluent cells and after cell contacts were disrupted by depletion of extracellular Ca2+, suggesting that endocytic trafficking of E-cadherin is regulated by cell-cell contact. The reformation of cell junctions after replacement of Ca2+ was then found to be inhibited when recycling of endocytosed E-cadherin was disrupted by bafilomycin treatment. The endocytosis and recycling of E-cadherin and of the transferrin receptor were similarly inhibited by potassium depletion and by bafilomycin treatment, and both proteins were accumulated in intracellular compartments by an 18 degrees C temperature block, suggesting that endocytosis may occur via a clathrin-mediated pathway. We conclude that a pool of surface E-cadherin is constantly trafficked through an endocytic, recycling pathway and that this may provide a mechanism for regulating the availability of E-cadherin for junction formation in development, tissue remodeling, and tumorigenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 234 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 28%
Researcher 48 19%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 8%
Engineering 6 2%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 28 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#5,766
of 11,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,816
of 34,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#24
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.