↓ Skip to main content

Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals differentially phosphorylated proteins regulate anther and pollen development in kenaf cytoplasmic male sterility line

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals differentially phosphorylated proteins regulate anther and pollen development in kenaf cytoplasmic male sterility line
Published in
Amino Acids, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00726-018-2564-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Chen, Ru Li, Ruiyang Zhou

Abstract

Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is widely used in plant breeding and represents a perfect model to understand cyto-nuclear interactions and pollen development research. Protein phosphorylation is ubiquitous and is involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes. To reveal the possible mechanism of CMS and pollen development in kenaf, we performed an iTRAQ-based comparative phosphoproteome analysis in the anthers of a CMS line and wild-type plant (Wt). Whole transcriptome unigenes of kenaf as the reference genome, we identified a total of 3045 phosphorylated sites on 1640 peptides corresponding to 974 unique proteins. 292 of the peptides which corresponding to 247 unique proteins were differentially phosphorylated (fold change ≥ 1.20 with P value< 0.05) between these two materials. 113 and 134 proteins were characterized as up-regulated or down-regulated phosphorylated, respectively. An evaluation of the phosphoproteome and proteomic results indicated that the most significantly phosphorylated proteins were not associated with abundant changes at the protein level. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrated that many of these proteins were involved in various biological processes which may play key roles in pollen development, including carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, transport, gene expression regulation, signal transduction, and cell cycle control. Our results provide insight into the CMS mechanism and pollen development in kenaf from a protein phosphorylation perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,290
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,344
of 329,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.