↓ Skip to main content

AtGGM2014, an Arabidopsis gene co-expression network for functional studies

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
AtGGM2014, an Arabidopsis gene co-expression network for functional studies
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11427-015-4803-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

ShiSong Ma, Hans J. Bohnert, Savithramma P. Dinesh-Kumar

Abstract

Gene co-expression networks provide an important tool for systems biology studies. Using microarray data from the ArrayExpress database, we constructed an Arabidopsis gene co-expression network, termed AtGGM2014, based on the graphical Gaussian model, which contains 102,644 co-expression gene pairs among 18,068 genes. The network was grouped into 622 gene co-expression modules. These modules function in diverse house-keeping, cell cycle, development, hormone response, metabolism, and stress response pathways. We developed a tool to facilitate easy visualization of the expression patterns of these modules either in a tissue context or their regulation under different treatment conditions. The results indicate that at least six modules with tissue-specific expression pattern failed to record modular regulation under various stress conditions. This discrepancy could be best explained by the fact that experiments to study plant stress responses focused mainly on leaves and less on roots, and thus failed to recover specific regulation pattern in other tissues. Overall, the modular structures revealed by our network provide extensive information to generate testable hypotheses about diverse plant signaling pathways. AtGGM2014 offers a constructive tool for plant systems biology studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,429,013
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#371
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,456
of 355,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.