↓ Skip to main content

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis presenting as atypical anorexia nervosa: an adolescent case report

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis presenting as atypical anorexia nervosa: an adolescent case report
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00787-015-0682-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Mechelhoff, Betteke Maria van Noort, Bernhard Weschke, Christian J. Bachmann, Christiane Wagner, Ernst Pfeiffer, Sibylle Winter

Abstract

Since 2007, more than 600 patients have been diagnosed with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, with almost 40 % of those affected being children or adolescents. In early phases of the illness, this life-threatening disease is characterized by psychiatric symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, obsessions, hallucinations or delusions. Consequently, a high percentage of patients receive psychiatric diagnoses at first, hindering the crucial early diagnosis and treatment of the anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. We report on a 15-year-old girl initially presenting with pathological eating behaviour and significant weight loss resulting in an (atypical) anorexia nervosa (AN) diagnosis. Her early course of illness, diagnostic process, treatment and short-term outcome are described. This case report aims to raise awareness about the association between anorectic behaviour and anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and highlight the importance of multidisciplinary teams in child and adolescent services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Psychology 15 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,342,399
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,209
of 1,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,583
of 363,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.