↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a health system strengthening intervention on maternal and child health outputs and outcomes in rural Rwanda 2005–2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Global Health Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a health system strengthening intervention on maternal and child health outputs and outcomes in rural Rwanda 2005–2010
Published in
BMJ Global Health Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana R Thomson, Cheryl Amoroso, Sidney Atwood, Matthew H Bonds, Felix Cyamatare Rwabukwisi, Peter Drobac, Karen E Finnegan, Didi Bertrand Farmer, Paul E Farmer, Antoinette Habinshuti, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Anatole Manzi, Peter Niyigena, Michael L Rich, Sara Stulac, Megan B Murray, Agnes Binagwaho

Abstract

Although Rwanda's health system underwent major reforms and improvements after the 1994 Genocide, the health system and population health in the southeast lagged behind other areas. In 2005, Partners In Health and the Rwandan Ministry of Health began a health system strengthening intervention in this region. We evaluate potential impacts of the intervention on maternal and child health indicators. Combining results from the 2005 and 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys with those from a supplemental 2010 survey, we compared changes in health system output indicators and population health outcomes between 2005 and 2010 as reported by women living in the intervention area with those reported by the pooled population of women from all other rural areas of the country, controlling for potential confounding by economic and demographic variables. Overall health system coverage improved similarly in the comparison groups between 2005 and 2010, with an indicator of composite coverage of child health interventions increasing from 57.9% to 75.0% in the intervention area and from 58.7% to 73.8% in the other rural areas. Under-five mortality declined by an annual rate of 12.8% in the intervention area, from 229.8 to 83.2 deaths per 1000 live births, and by 8.9% in other rural areas, from 157.7 to 75.8 deaths per 1000 live births. Improvements were most marked among the poorest households. We observed dramatic improvements in population health outcomes including under-five mortality between 2005 and 2010 in rural Rwanda generally and in the intervention area specifically.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,117,190
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#2,401
of 3,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,075
of 344,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#55
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.