↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12265-018-9787-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey W. Holmes, Joost Lumens

Abstract

Over the past several decades, increasingly sophisticated models of the heart have provided important insights into cardiac physiology and are increasingly used to predict the impact of diseases and therapies on the heart. In an era of personalized medicine, many envision patient-specific computational models as a powerful tool for personalizing therapy. Yet the complexity of current models poses important challenges, including identifying model parameters and completing calculations quickly enough for routine clinical use. We propose that early clinical successes are likely to arise from an alternative approach: relatively simple, fast, phenomenologic models with a small number of parameters that can be easily (and automatically) customized. We discuss examples of simple yet foundational models that have already made a tremendous impact on clinical education and practice, and make the case that reducing rather than increasing model complexity may be the key to realizing the promise of patient-specific modeling for clinical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Researcher 8 14%
Unspecified 7 12%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 30%
Unspecified 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Computer Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#440
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,247
of 336,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.