You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-associated Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Narrative Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nabil Fallouh, Helen M. McGuirk, Scott A. Flanders, Vineet Chopra |
| Abstract |
Although common, little is known about factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (PICC-DVT). To better guide clinicians, we performed a comprehensive literature review to summarize best practices in this condition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 64% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 18% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#546,079
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#258
of 7,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,488
of 271,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.