↓ Skip to main content

Peptide Amphiphile Micelles Self-Adjuvant Group A Streptococcal Vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Peptide Amphiphile Micelles Self-Adjuvant Group A Streptococcal Vaccination
Published in
The AAPS Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1208/s12248-014-9707-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Trent, Bret D. Ulery, Matthew J. Black, John C. Barrett, Simon Liang, Yulia Kostenko, Natalie A. David, Matthew V. Tirrell

Abstract

Delivery system design and adjuvant development are crucially important areas of research for improving vaccines. Peptide amphiphile micelles are a class of biomaterials that have the unique potential to function as both vaccine delivery vehicles and self-adjuvants. In this study, peptide amphiphiles comprised of a group A streptococcus B cell antigen (J8) and a dialkyl hydrophobic moiety (diC16) were synthesized and organized into self-assembled micelles, driven by hydrophobic interactions among the alkyl tails. J8-diC16 formed cylindrical micelles with highly α-helical peptide presented on their surfaces. Both the micelle length and secondary structure were shown to be enhanced by annealing. When injected into mice, J8-diC16 micelles induced a strong IgG1 antibody response that was comparable to soluble J8 peptide supplemented with two classical adjuvants. It was discovered that micelle adjuvanticity requires the antigen be a part of the micelle since separation of J8 and the micelle was insufficient to induce an immune response. Additionally, the diC16 tail appears to be non-immunogenic since it does not stimulate a pathogen recognition receptor whose agonist (Pam3Cys) possesses a very similar chemical structure. The research presented in this paper demonstrates the promise peptide amphiphile micelles have in improving the field of vaccine engineering.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 20%
Chemical Engineering 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,736,168
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#98
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,730
of 354,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.