↓ Skip to main content

Spatio-temporal waves and targeted vaccination in recurrent epidemic network models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatio-temporal waves and targeted vaccination in recurrent epidemic network models
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, October 2008
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2008.0343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Litvak-Hinenzon, Lewi Stone

Abstract

The success of an infectious disease to invade a population is strongly controlled by the population's specific connectivity structure. Here, a network model is presented as an aid in understanding the role of social behaviour and heterogeneous connectivity in determining the spatio-temporal patterns of disease dynamics. We explore the controversial origins of long-term recurrent oscillations believed to be characteristic of diseases that have a period of temporary immunity after infection. In particular, we focus on sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis, where this controversy is currently under review. Although temporary immunity plays a key role, it is found that, in realistic small-world networks, the social and sexual behaviour of individuals also has a great influence in generating long-term cycles. The model generates circular waves of infection with unusual spatial dynamics that depend on focal areas that act as pacemakers in the population. Eradication of the disease can be efficiently achieved by eliminating the pacemakers with a targeted vaccination scheme. A simple difference equation model is derived, which captures the infection dynamics of the network model and gives insights into their origins and their eradication through vaccination. Illustrative videos may be found in the electronic supplementary material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 5%
India 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 52 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Physics and Astronomy 6 10%
Computer Science 5 8%
Mathematics 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#2,676
of 3,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,389
of 91,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#19
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.