↓ Skip to main content

Smoking quantity determines disease activity and function in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Smoking quantity determines disease activity and function in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4016-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Zhang, Wei Wan, Jing Liu, Shengming Dai, Yaohong Zou, Qiaoxia Qian, Yue Ding, Xia Xu, Hengdong Ji, Hongjun He, Qi Zhu, Chengde Yang, Shuang Ye, Lindi Jiang, Jianping Tang, Qiang Tong, Dongyi He, Dongbao Zhao, Yuan Li, Yanyun Ma, Jingru Zhou, Zhendong Mei, Xiangxiang Chen, Ziyu Yuan, Juan Zhang, Xiaofeng Wang, Yajun Yang, Li Jin, Ying Gao, Xiaodong Zhou, John D. Reveille, Hejian Zou, Jiucun Wang

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systemically and comprehensively evaluate the associations between smoking and disease outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Information on smoking, clinical features, and sociodemographic characteristics was collected by a questionnaire administered directly to the patient. Group differences were analyzed by t test or chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was conducted with the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate as the dependent variables and different stratification of smoking duration, smoking intensity, and cumulative smoking as independent variables. In order to compare our results with previous studies, meta-analysis was performed to calculate standardized mean difference (SMD) for relationship between outcomes and smoking status. A total of 1178 AS patients were analyzed. Compared with non-smokers, the risk of having active disease (BASDAI ≥ 4) was higher in patients who smoked at least 15 years, or 15 cigarettes per day, or 15 pack-years (OR = 1.70 [1.06, 2.73], 1.75 [1.08, 2.82], and 1.97 [1.06, 3.67], respectively); and smokers had increasing risk of BASDAI ≥ 4 with increasing years of smoking, or cigarettes per day, or pack-years (p-trend = 0.010, 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). The risk of having active disease was higher in patients who smoked at least 15 cigarettes per day or 15 pack-years (OR = 1.74 [1.06, 2.84] and 2.89 [1.56, 5.35], respectively), with increasing number of cigarettes per day and pack-years. Smokers had an increased risk of BASFI ≥ 4 (p-trend = 0.040 and 0.007, respectively). By meta-analysis, current, former and ever smokers had significantly higher BASDAI (SMD = 0.34 [0.18, 0.48], 0.10 [0.01, 0.19], and 0.27 [0.20, 0.34], respectively) and BASFI (SMD = 0.35 [0.16, 0.55], 0.30 [0.22, 0.39], and 0.35 [0.21, 0.50], respectively) compared to non-smokers. Smoking is a risk factor for greater disease activity and worse functioning in AS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,945,904
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,265
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,789
of 330,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#39
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.