| Title |
Why biodiversity declines as protected areas increase: the effect of the power of governance regimes on sustainable landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sustainability Science, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11625-015-0288-6 |
| Authors |
Rosemary Hill, Craig Miller, Barry Newell, Michael Dunlop, Iain J. Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 20% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Scientists | 10 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 283 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 106 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,192,452
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#90
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,569
of 374,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.