↓ Skip to main content

Stomatal structure and physiology do not explain differences in water use among montane eucalypts

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Stomatal structure and physiology do not explain differences in water use among montane eucalypts
Published in
Oecologia, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3252-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mana Gharun, Tarryn L. Turnbull, Sebastian Pfautsch, Mark A. Adams

Abstract

Understanding the regulation of water use at the whole-tree scale is critical to advancing the utility of physiological ecology, for example in its role in predictive hydrology of forested catchments. For three eucalypt species that dominate high-elevation catchments in south-eastern Australia, we examined if whole-tree water use could be related to three widely discussed regulators of water use: stomatal anatomy, sensitivity of stomata [i.e. stomatal conductance (g s)] to environmental influences, and sapwood area. While daily tree water use varied sixfold among species, sap velocity and sapwood area varied in parallel. Combined, stomatal structure and physiology could not explain differences in species-specific water use. Species which exhibited the fastest (Eucalyptus delegatensis) and slowest (Eucalyptus pauciflora) rates of water use both exhibited greater capacity for physiological control of g s [indicated by sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit (VPD)] and a reduced capacity to limit g s anatomically [indicated by greater potential g s (g max)]. Conversely, g s was insensitive to VPD and g max was lowest for Eucalyptus radiata, the species showing intermediate rates of water use. Improved knowledge of stomatal anatomy will help us to understand the capacity of species to regulate leaf-level water loss, but seems likely to remain of limited use for explaining rates of whole-tree water use in montane eucalypts at the catchment scale.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 39%
Environmental Science 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 13 36%