↓ Skip to main content

Adjustable versus non‐adjustable male sling for post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence: A prospective clinical trial comparing patient choice, clinical outcomes and satisfaction rate with a minimum…

Overview of attention for article published in Neurourology and Urodynamics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjustable versus non‐adjustable male sling for post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence: A prospective clinical trial comparing patient choice, clinical outcomes and satisfaction rate with a minimum follow up of 24 months
Published in
Neurourology and Urodynamics, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/nau.22731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Chung, Philip Smith, Gregory Malone, Ross Cartmill

Abstract

To review the patient choice, clinical outcomes and satisfaction rate between adjustable and non-adjustable male sling (MS) with a minimum follow up of 24 months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#16,155,468
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#1,380
of 2,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,256
of 369,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.