| Title |
Understanding Inter-settlement Visibility in Iron Age and Roman Southern Spain with Exponential Random Graph Models for Visibility Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-014-9231-x |
| Authors |
Tom Brughmans, Simon Keay, Graeme Earl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Austria | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 36 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,442,783
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#222
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,224
of 357,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.