| Title |
Weightlifting Pulling Derivatives: Rationale for Implementation and Application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-015-0314-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy J. Suchomel, Paul Comfort, Michael H. Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 205 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 63 | 31% |
| United States | 35 | 17% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Ireland | 8 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 78% |
| Scientists | 36 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 451 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Researcher | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 85 | 19% |
| Unknown | 108 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 246 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 118 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#285,705
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#265
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,162
of 269,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.