↓ Skip to main content

Segments of the Internal Carotid Artery During Endoscopic Transnasal and Open Cranial Approaches: Can a Uniform Nomenclature Apply to Both?

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Segments of the Internal Carotid Artery During Endoscopic Transnasal and Open Cranial Approaches: Can a Uniform Nomenclature Apply to Both?
Published in
World Neurosurgery, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

John J. DePowell, Sebastien C. Froelich, Lee A. Zimmer, James L. Leach, Alexandre Karkas, Philip V. Theodosopoulos, Jeffrey T. Keller

Abstract

The classic anatomic view of the course of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and its segments familiar to neurosurgeons by a 3-dimensional microscopic cranial view may be challenging to understand when seen in the unique 2-dimensional view of transnasal endoscopic surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 54%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#4,319
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,860
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.