↓ Skip to main content

Individual variation in anthropogenic resource use in an urban carnivore

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Individual variation in anthropogenic resource use in an urban carnivore
Published in
Oecologia, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3205-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth D. Newsome, Heidi M. Garbe, Evan C. Wilson, Stanley D. Gehrt

Abstract

With increasing urbanization, some animals are adapting to human-dominated systems, offering unique opportunities to study individual adaptation to novel environments. One hypothesis for why some wildlife succeed in urban areas is that they are subsidized with anthropogenic food. Here, we combine individual-level movement patterns with diet composition based on stable isotope analysis to assess the degree to which a rapidly growing population of coyotes (Canis latrans) in Chicago consumes anthropogenic resources. We used telemetry to classify coyotes into three groups based on social class and home range composition: (1) residents with home ranges in urban nature preserves; (2) residents with home ranges that had a high proportion of urban land; and (3) transients that had relatively large home ranges and variable use of urban land. We found that natural and anthropogenic resources in this system can be reliably partitioned with carbon isotopes. Mixing models revealed that resident coyotes associated with most urban nature preserves consumed trace to minimal amounts of anthropogenic resources, while coyotes that live in the urban matrix consume moderate (30-50 %) to high (>50 %) proportions of anthropogenic resources. Lastly, we found evidence of prey switching between natural and anthropogenic resources and a high degree of inter-individual variation in diet among coyotes. In contrast to the expectation that urban adaptation may dampen ecological variation, our results suggest individuality in movement and diet exemplifies the successful establishment of coyotes in urban Chicago. Our study also suggests that direct anthropogenic food subsidization is not a prerequisite for successful adaptation to urban environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 282 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 51 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 48%
Environmental Science 64 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 67 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,803,937
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,165
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,132
of 357,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#43
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.