Title |
iPiasco: Inertial Proximal Algorithm for Strongly Convex Optimization
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10851-015-0565-0 |
Authors |
Peter Ochs, Thomas Brox, Thomas Pock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 40% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 7 | 28% |
Computer Science | 6 | 24% |
Engineering | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,004
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#145
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,063
of 255,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.