You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is the Quality of Sushi Ruined by Freezing Raw Fish and Squid? A Randomized Double-Blind Trial With Sensory Evaluation Using Discrimination Testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/civ057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kentaro Iwata, Takahiko Fukuchi, Kenichi Yoshimura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 317 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 74 | 23% |
| United States | 24 | 8% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Russia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 191 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 301 | 95% |
| Scientists | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#120,021
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#318
of 16,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,221
of 269,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.