↓ Skip to main content

Returning to Work Following Low Back Pain: Towards a Model of Individual Psychosocial Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Returning to Work Following Low Back Pain: Towards a Model of Individual Psychosocial Factors
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10926-014-9522-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elyssa Besen, Amanda E. Young, William S. Shaw

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to develop and test a model of direct and indirect relationships among individual psychosocial predictors of return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following the onset of low back pain (LBP). Methods We utilize secondary analysis of a larger study of adults seeking treatment for work-related LBP with recent onset. In total, 241 participants who completed a baseline survey, a short follow-up survey, and a longer follow-up survey after 3 months were included in our analyses. The participants were required to have LBP with onset of less than 14 days, be 18 years or older, and be fluent in English or Spanish. The analyses utilized structural equation models to test the direct and indirect relationships among the variables and RTW outcomes at 3 months. Results Our results indicated a good fit for our model (χ2 = 69.59, df = 45, p < .05; RMSEA = .05; CFI = .95; WRMR = .61). Pain, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, organizational support, and RTW confidence were all found to have indirect relationships with the outcomes. RTW confidence and RTW expectations were found to have direct relationships with the outcomes. Conclusions The process of returning to work after an episode of LBP is a complex process involving many interrelated factors. Understanding the relationships among critical individual factors in the RTW process may be important for the treatment and rehabilitation of those with LBP. Results suggest that if injured workers are struggling with fear avoidance, pain catastrophizing and confidence issues, they might benefit from the application of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 176 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Psychology 24 13%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,103,678
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#132
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,814
of 226,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.