↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and distribution of VZV in temporal arteries of patients with giant cell arteritis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
18 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and distribution of VZV in temporal arteries of patients with giant cell arteritis
Published in
Neurology, February 2015
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don Gilden, Teresa White, Nelly Khmeleva, Anna Heintzman, Alexander Choe, Philip J Boyer, Charles Grose, John E Carpenter, April Rempel, Nathan Bos, Balasubramaniyam Kandasamy, Kelly Lear-Kaul, Dawn B Holmes, Jeffrey L Bennett, Randall J Cohrs, Ravi Mahalingam, Naresh Mandava, Charles G Eberhart, Brian Bockelman, Robert J Poppiti, Madhura A Tamhankar, Franz Fogt, Malena Amato, Edward Wood, Vikram Durairaj, Steve Rasmussen, Vigdis Petursdottir, Lea Pollak, Sonia Mendlovic, Denis Chatelain, Kathy Keyvani, Wolfgang Brueck, Maria A Nagel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 22%
Other 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 32 26%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 51%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#634,268
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#1,169
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,656
of 269,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#17
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.