↓ Skip to main content

Monovalerin and trivalerin increase brain acetic acid, decrease liver succinic acid, and alter gut microbiota in rats fed high-fat diets

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Monovalerin and trivalerin increase brain acetic acid, decrease liver succinic acid, and alter gut microbiota in rats fed high-fat diets
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1688-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thao Duy Nguyen, Olena Prykhodko, Frida Fåk Hållenius, Margareta Nyman

Abstract

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are known for their anti-inflammatory properties and may also prevent against the development of metabolic diseases. This study investigated possible effects of two valeric acid esters, monovalerin (MV) and trivalerin (TV) in rats fed high-fat diets. Four groups of rats were given a low-fat diet (LF) or a high-fat control diet (HFC) with or without supplementation of MV or TV (5 g/kg) for 3 weeks (n = 7/group). SCFA (caecum, blood, liver and brain), succinic acid (liver), microbiota (caecum), lipid profile (liver and blood) and the inflammatory biomarker, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (blood) were analysed at the end of the experiment. Supplementation of MV and TV to a high-fat diet increased 1.5-fold the amounts of acetic acid in the brain and 1.7-fold serum concentration of valeric acid, whereas liver succinic acid was reduced by 1.5-fold. Although liver triglyceride levels were higher in both MV and TV groups compared with the LF group, liver LDL/HDL ratio was lower in the MV group (P < 0.05). The caecal microbiota composition was altered, with threefold higher abundance of Bacteroidetes and higher ratio of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes in the MV group compared with the HFC and LF groups. Acetic acid in the brain was negatively correlated with TM7, family S24-7 and rc4-4, and positively associated to Tenericutes and Anaeroplasma. The present study shows that MV and TV in the specified dose can affect caecal microbiota composition and, therefore, bacterial metabolites in the liver, serum and brain as well as the lipid profile in the liver.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,974
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,548
of 329,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#54
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.