↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroid use in the intensive care unit: a survey of intensivists

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Corticosteroid use in the intensive care unit: a survey of intensivists
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12630-013-9929-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Lamontagne, Hector Quiroz Martinez, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Deborah J. Cook, Karen K. Y. Koo, François Lauzier, Alexis F. Turgeon, Michelle E. Kho, Karen E. A. Burns, Clarence Chant, Rob Fowler, Ivor Douglas, Yannick Poulin, Karen Choong, Niall D. Ferguson, Maureen O. Meade

Abstract

The efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in many critical illnesses remains uncertain. Our primary objective was to survey intensivists in North America about their perceived use of corticosteroids in clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,072
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,768
of 210,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.