↓ Skip to main content

Is the Soleus a Sentinel Muscle for Impaired Aerobic Capacity in Heart Failure?

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Soleus a Sentinel Muscle for Impaired Aerobic Capacity in Heart Failure?
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, March 2015
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000000431
Pubmed ID
Authors

FAUSTO A. PANIZZOLO, ANDREW J. MAIORANA, LOUISE H. NAYLOR, GLEN A. LICHTWARK, LAWRENCE DEMBO, DAVID G. LLOYD, DANIEL J. GREEN, JONAS RUBENSON

Abstract

Skeletal muscle wasting is well documented in chronic heart failure (CHF). This article provides a more detailed understanding of the morphology behind this muscle wasting and the relation between muscle morphology, strength, and exercise capacity in CHF. We investigated the effect of CHF on lower limb lean mass, detailed muscle-tendon architecture of the individual triceps surae muscles (soleus (SOL), medial gastrocnemius, and lateral gastrocnemius) and how these parameters relate to exercise capacity and strength.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Engineering 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#5,491
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,988
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#65
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.