↓ Skip to main content

Inactivation of ceramide synthase 2 catalytic activity in mice affects transcription of genes involved in lipid metabolism and cell division

Overview of attention for article published in BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inactivation of ceramide synthase 2 catalytic activity in mice affects transcription of genes involved in lipid metabolism and cell division
Published in
BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Bickert, Paul Kern, Martina van Uelft, Stefanie Herresthal, Thomas Ulas, Katharina Gutbrod, Bernadette Breiden, Joachim Degen, Konrad Sandhoff, Joachim L. Schultze, Peter Dörmann, Dieter Hartmann, Reinhard Bauer, Klaus Willecke

Abstract

The replacement of two consecutive histidine residues by alanine residues in the catalytic center of ceramide synthase 2 in a new transgenic mouse mutant (CerS2 H/A) leads to inactivation of catalytic activity and reduces protein level to 60% of the WT level. We show here by qRT-PCR and transcriptome analyses that several transcripts of genes involved in lipid metabolism and cell division are differentially regulated in livers of CerS2 H/A mice. Thus, very long chain ceramides produced by CerS2 are required for transcriptional regulation of target genes. The hepatocellular carcinomata previously described in old CerS2 KO mice were already present in 8-week-old CerS2 H/A animals and thus are caused by the loss of CerS2 catalytic activity already during early life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,782,070
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids
#175
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,014
of 343,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.