You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mass Treatment with Single-Dose Azithromycin for Yaws
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1408586 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oriol Mitjà, Wendy Houinei, Penias Moses, August Kapa, Raymond Paru, Russell Hays, Sheila Lukehart, Charmie Godornes, Sibauk Vivaldo Bieb, Tim Grice, Peter Siba, David Mabey, Sergi Sanz, Pedro L Alonso, Kingsley Asiedu, Quique Bassat |
Abstract |
Mass treatment with azithromycin is a central component of the new World Health Organization (WHO) strategy to eradicate yaws. Empirical data on the effectiveness of the strategy are required as a prerequisite for worldwide implementation of the plan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 7 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Uganda | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 93% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 40 | 18% |
Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
Other | 40 | 18% |
Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 56 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#390,994
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,730
of 32,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,473
of 269,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#77
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.