↓ Skip to main content

Gender-specific Associations Between Soy and Risk of Hip Fracture in the Singapore Chinese Health Study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender-specific Associations Between Soy and Risk of Hip Fracture in the Singapore Chinese Health Study
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, August 2009
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwp220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woon-Puay Koh, Anna H Wu, Renwei Wang, Li-Wei Ang, Derrick Heng, Jian-Min Yuan, Mimi C Yu

Abstract

Although there is some epidemiologic evidence that soy may reduce risk of osteoporotic fracture in women, it is not known whether this risk reduction also occurs for men. The authors examined gender-specific associations between soy intake and hip fracture risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a prospective cohort of 63,257 Chinese living in Singapore. At recruitment between 1993 and 1998, each subject was administered a food frequency questionnaire and questions on medical history and lifestyle factors. As of December 31, 2006, 276 incident cases of hip fracture in men and 692 cases in women were identified via linkage with hospital discharge databases. For both genders, hip fracture risk was positively associated with cigarette smoking and was inversely associated with body mass index. There was a statistically significant association of tofu equivalents, soy protein, and isoflavones with hip fracture risk among women but not among men. Compared with women in the lowest quartile of intakes for tofu equivalents (<49.4 g/day), soy protein (<2.7 g/day), and isoflavones (<5.8 mg/1,000 kcal/day), those in the second-fourth quartiles exhibited 21%-36% reductions in risk (all P < 0.036). Risk levels were comparable across the second, third, and fourth quartiles of soy intake categories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,237,958
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#2,233
of 9,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,916
of 95,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.