You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Double Inversion Recovery MR Sequence for the Detection of Subacute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a4102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Hodel, R Aboukais, B Dutouquet, E Kalsoum, M A Benadjaoud, D Chechin, M Zins, A Rahmouni, A Luciani, J-P Pruvo, J-P Lejeune, X Leclerc |
| Abstract |
The diagnosis of subacute subarachnoid hemorrhage is important because rebleeding may occur with subsequent life-threatening hemorrhage. Our aim was to determine the sensitivity of the 3D double inversion recovery sequence compared with CT, 2D and 3D FLAIR, 2D T2*, and 3D SWI sequences for the detection of subacute SAH. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,168,433
of 23,837,558 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#369
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,340
of 241,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,837,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.