↓ Skip to main content

Demographics and discharge outcomes of dysvascular and non-vascular lower limb amputees at a subacute rehabilitation unit: a 7-year series

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Health Review, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Demographics and discharge outcomes of dysvascular and non-vascular lower limb amputees at a subacute rehabilitation unit: a 7-year series
Published in
Australian Health Review, January 2015
DOI 10.1071/ah14042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather R Batten, Suzanne S Kuys, Steven M McPhail, Paulose N Varghese, Jennifer C Nitz

Abstract

Objective To examine personal and social demographics, and rehabilitation discharge outcomes of dysvascular and non-vascular lower limb amputees. Methods In total, 425 lower limb amputation inpatient rehabilitation admissions (335 individuals) from 2005 to 2011 were examined. Admission and discharge descriptive statistics (frequency, percentages) were calculated and compared by aetiology. Results Participants were male (74%), aged 65 years (s.d. 14), born in Australia (72%), had predominantly dysvascular aetiology (80%) and a median length of stay 48 days (interquartile range (IQR): 25-76). Following amputation, 56% received prostheses for mobility, 21% (n=89) changed residence and 28% (n=116) required community services. Dysvascular amputees were older (mean 67 years, s.d. 12 vs 54 years, s.d. 16; Pz=3.61, Pz=4.52, Pvs 11%; Pvs 52%; P<0.001) and had a shorter length of stay (7 days, 95% confidence interval: -3 to 17), although this was not statistically significant. Conclusions Differences exist in social and demographic outcomes between dysvascular and non-vascular lower limb amputees. What is known about the topic? Lower limb amputation occurs due to various aetiologies. What does this paper add? Lower limb amputee rehabilitation over 7 years was investigated, comprising 425 admissions, 80% due to dysvascular aetiology. Personal and social demographics, and discharge outcomes are compared by aetiology. What are the implications for practitioners? Demographic and discharge outcome differences exist between dysvascular and non-vascular lower limb amputees. Twenty-one percent were required to change residence and 28% required additional social supports. Discharge planning should begin as soon as possible to limit time spent waiting for new accommodation or major modifications for current homes. Lower limb amputees are not homogeneous, so care should be taken if extrapolating from combined amputee aetiologies or from one aetiology to another.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 25%
Sports and Recreations 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%