↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal changes in lean mass predict pQCT measures of tibial geometry and mineralisation at 6–7years

Overview of attention for article published in BONE, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 4,330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
25 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal changes in lean mass predict pQCT measures of tibial geometry and mineralisation at 6–7years
Published in
BONE, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca J. Moon, Zoe A. Cole, Sarah R. Crozier, Elizabeth M. Curtis, Justin H. Davies, Celia L. Gregson, Sian M. Robinson, Elaine M. Dennison, Keith M. Godfrey, Hazel M. Inskip, Cyrus Cooper, Nicholas C. Harvey, The Southampton Women's Survey Study Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2015.
All research outputs
#823,786
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from BONE
#47
of 4,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,087
of 268,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BONE
#2
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.