↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a specialist and a generic parenting programme for the treatment of preschool ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a specialist and a generic parenting programme for the treatment of preschool ADHD
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna C McCann, Margaret Thompson, David Daley, Joanne Barton, Cathy Laver-Bradbury, Judy Hutchings, David Coghill, Louise Stanton, Tom Maishman, Liz Dixon, Josh Caddy, Maria Chorozoglou, James Raftery, Edmund Sonuga-Barke

Abstract

The New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP) is a home-delivered, evidence-based parenting programme to target symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschool children. It has been adapted for use with 'hard-to-reach' or 'difficult-to-treat' children. This trial will compare the adapted-NFPP with a generic parenting group-based programme, Incredible Years (IY), which has been recommended for children with preschool-type ADHD symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 61 33%