You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epigenome Mapping Reveals Distinct Modes of Gene Regulation and Widespread Enhancer Reprogramming by the Oncogenic Fusion Protein EWS-FLI1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleni M. Tomazou, Nathan C. Sheffield, Christian Schmidl, Michael Schuster, Andreas Schönegger, Paul Datlinger, Stefan Kubicek, Christoph Bock, Heinrich Kovar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Austria | 3 | 21% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 25% |
| Researcher | 54 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,305,406
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#5,141
of 12,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,211
of 269,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#71
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.