| Title |
The response of faunal biodiversity to an unmarked road in the Western Amazon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-015-0883-y |
| Authors |
Andrew Whitworth, Christopher Beirne, Jasmine Rowe, Fraser Ross, Caroline Acton, Oliver Burdekin, Philip Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 27% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Peru | 3 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,721,175
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#233
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,026
of 260,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.