| Title |
Ignoring seasonal changes in the ecological niche of non-migratory species may lead to biases in potential distribution models: lessons from bats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1545-7 |
| Authors |
Sonia Smeraldo, Mirko Di Febbraro, Luciano Bosso, Carles Flaquer, David Guixé, Fulgencio Lisón, Angelika Meschede, Javier Juste, Julia Prüger, Xavier Puig-Montserrat, Danilo Russo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 12% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,322,807
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#527
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,412
of 331,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.