| Title |
Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ewan C. Goligher, Franco Laghi, Michael E. Detsky, Paulina Farias, Alistair Murray, Deborah Brace, Laurent J. Brochard, Steffen Sebastien-Bolz, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Brian P. Kavanagh, Niall D. Ferguson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 425 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 11% |
| Researcher | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Other | 109 | 25% |
| Unknown | 103 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 232 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Unknown | 125 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,305,994
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,736
of 5,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,781
of 261,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#27
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.