| Title |
Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3693-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Byung Ju Kang, Younsuck Koh, Chae-Man Lim, Jin Won Huh, Seunghee Baek, Myongja Han, Hyun-Suk Seo, Hee Jung Suh, Ga Jin Seo, Eun Young Kim, Sang-Bum Hong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 66 | 15% |
| Researcher | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 94 | 21% |
| Unknown | 112 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 257 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Unknown | 125 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,972,662
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,580
of 5,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,020
of 260,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.