↓ Skip to main content

Permanent Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL) and Childhood Development

Overview of attention for article published in Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 111)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Permanent Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL) and Childhood Development
Published in
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40136-018-0185-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith E. C. Lieu

Abstract

The aim of this study is to summarize the consequences of permanent unilateral hearing loss (UHL) on the development of children as documented in the recent literature. Congenital and early-identified UHL places young children at risk for delays in speech-language development. School-aged children with UHL score lower on standardized tests of language and cognition and need increased assistance in school for educational and behavioral issues than siblings with normal hearing, and report lower hearing-related quality of life, similar to children with bilateral hearing loss (HL). Early intervention, including use of hearing amplification devices, might ameliorate some of those affects. For a child with mild to severe UHL at presentation, the risk of progression of HL in the worse-hearing ear may be as high as 40%, and the risk of progression to bilateral HL approaches 20%. Although UHL can adversely affect the development of children, how to mitigate those effects requires investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,288,996
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports
#15
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,768
of 487,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them