↓ Skip to main content

Inducibility of ventricular fibrillation during mild therapeutic hypothermia: electrophysiological study in a swine model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Inducibility of ventricular fibrillation during mild therapeutic hypothermia: electrophysiological study in a swine model
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0429-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaroslav Kudlicka, Mikulas Mlcek, Jan Belohlavek, Pavel Hala, Stanislav Lacko, David Janak, Stepan Havranek, Jan Malik, Tomas Janota, Petr Ostadal, Petr Neuzil, Otomar Kittnar

Abstract

Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is being used after cardiac arrest for its expected improvement in neurological outcome. Safety of MTH concerning inducibility of malignant arrhythmias has not been satisfactorily demonstrated. This study compares inducibility of ventricular fibrillation (VF) before and after induction of MTH in a whole body swine model and evaluates possible interaction with changing potassium plasma levels. The extracorporeal cooling was introduced in fully anesthetized swine (n = 6) to provide MTH. Inducibility of VF was studied by programmed ventricular stimulation three times in each animal under the following: during normothermia (NT), after reaching the core temperature of 32°C (HT) and after another 60 minutes of stable hypothermia (HT60). Inducibility of VF, effective refractory period of the ventricles (ERP), QTc interval and potassium plasma levels were measured. Starting at normothermia of 38.7 (IQR 38.2; 39.8)°C, HT was achieved within 54 (39; 59) minutes and the core temperature was further maintained constant. Overall, the inducibility of VF was 100% (18/18 attempts) at NT, 83% (15/18) after reaching HT (P = 0.23) and 39% (7/18) at HT60 (P = 0.0001) using the same protocol. Similarly, ERP prolonged from 140 (130; 150) ms at NT to 206 (190; 220) ms when reaching HT (P < 0.001) and remained 206 (193; 220) ms at HT60. QTc interval was inversely proportional to the core temperature and extended from 376 (362; 395) at NT to 570 (545; 599) ms at HT. Potassium plasma level changed spontaneously: decreased during cooling from 4.1 (3.9; 4.8) to 3.7 (3.4; 4.1) mmol/L at HT (P < 0.01), then began to increase and returned to baseline level at HT60 (4.6 (4.4; 5.0) mmol/L, P = NS). According to our swine model, MTH does not increase the risk of VF induction by ventricular pacing in healthy hearts. Moreover, when combined with normokalemia, MTH exerts an antiarrhythmic effect despite prolonged QTc interval.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,631
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,926
of 269,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#65
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.