You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Nutrition, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.02.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexia J. Murphy, Melinda White, Karina Viani, Terezie T. Mosby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Austria | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 220 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,714,912
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#1,673
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,595
of 269,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#24
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.