↓ Skip to main content

Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US
Published in
Oecologia, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3171-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. W. Woodall, M. B. Russell, B. F. Walters, A. W. D’Amato, S. Fraver, G. M. Domke

Abstract

Downed dead wood (DDW) in forest ecosystems is a C pool whose net flux is governed by a complex of natural and anthropogenic processes and is critical to the management of the entire forest C pool. As empirical examination of DDW C net flux has rarely been conducted across large scales, the goal of this study was to use a remeasured inventory of DDW C and ancillary forest attributes to assess C net flux across forests of the Eastern US. Stocks associated with large fine woody debris (diameter 2.6-7.6 cm) decreased over time (-0.11 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)), while stocks of larger-sized coarse DDW increased (0.02 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)). Stocks of total DDW C decreased (-0.14 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)), while standing dead and live tree stocks both increased, 0.01 and 0.44 Mg ha(-1) year(-1), respectively. The spatial distribution of DDW C stock change was highly heterogeneous with random forests model results indicating that management history, live tree stocking, natural disturbance, and growing degree days only partially explain stock change. Natural disturbances drove substantial C transfers from the live tree pool (≈-4 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)) to the standing dead tree pool (≈3 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)) with only a minimal increase in DDW C stocks (≈1 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)) in lower decay classes, suggesting a delayed transfer of C to the DDW pool. The assessment and management of DDW C flux is complicated by the diversity of natural and anthropogenic forces that drive their dynamics with the scale and timing of flux among forest C pools remaining a large knowledge gap.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 26%