| Title |
Crop wild relatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]: Distributions, ex situ conservation status, and potential genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.032 |
| Authors |
Colin K. Khoury, Nora P. Castañeda-Alvarez, Harold A. Achicanoy, Chrystian C. Sosa, Vivian Bernau, Mulualem T. Kassa, Sally L. Norton, L. Jos G. van der Maesen, Hari D. Upadhyaya, Julian Ramírez-Villegas, Andy Jarvis, Paul C. Struik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 19% |
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,342,504
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,141
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,927
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.