↓ Skip to main content

Are climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction
Published in
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13194-015-0108-y
Authors

Gregor Betz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 27%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,748,987
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#233
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,377
of 255,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them