You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Towards a framework for assessment and management of cumulative human impacts on marine food webs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sylvaine Giakoumi, Benjamin S. Halpern, Loïc N. Michel, Sylvie Gobert, Maria Sini, Charles‐François Boudouresque, Maria‐Cristina Gambi, Stelios Katsanevakis, Pierre Lejeune, Monica Montefalcone, Gerard Pergent, Christine Pergent‐Martini, Pablo Sanchez‐Jerez, Branko Velimirov, Salvatrice Vizzini, Arnaud Abadie, Marta Coll, Paolo Guidetti, Fiorenza Micheli, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 24% |
Canada | 2 | 12% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
Ghana | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 2 | <1% |
Greece | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 229 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 56 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 14% |
Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 4% |
Other | 45 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 77 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Engineering | 7 | 3% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,807,229
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,712
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,065
of 272,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.