↓ Skip to main content

A common variant mapping to CACNA1A is associated with susceptibility to exfoliation syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A common variant mapping to CACNA1A is associated with susceptibility to exfoliation syndrome
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tin Aung, Mineo Ozaki, Takanori Mizoguchi, R Rand Allingham, Zheng Li, Aravind Haripriya, Satoko Nakano, Steffen Uebe, Jeffrey M Harder, Anita S Y Chan, Mei Chin Lee, Kathryn P Burdon, Yury S Astakhov, Khaled K Abu-Amero, Juan C Zenteno, Yildirim Nilgün, Tomasz Zarnowski, Mohammad Pakravan, Leen Abu Safieh, Liyun Jia, Ya Xing Wang, Susan Williams, Daniela Paoli, Patricio G Schlottmann, Lulin Huang, Kar Seng Sim, Jia Nee Foo, Masakazu Nakano, Yoko Ikeda, Rajesh S Kumar, Morio Ueno, Shin-ichi Manabe, Ken Hayashi, Shigeyasu Kazama, Ryuichi Ideta, Yosai Mori, Kazunori Miyata, Kazuhisa Sugiyama, Tomomi Higashide, Etsuo Chihara, Kenji Inoue, Satoshi Ishiko, Akitoshi Yoshida, Masahide Yanagi, Yoshiaki Kiuchi, Makoto Aihara, Tsutomu Ohashi, Toshiya Sakurai, Takako Sugimoto, Hideki Chuman, Fumihiko Matsuda, Kenji Yamashiro, Norimoto Gotoh, Masahiro Miyake, Sergei Y Astakhov, Essam A Osman, Saleh A Al-Obeidan, Ohoud Owaidhah, Leyla Al-Jasim, Sami Al Shahwan, Rhys A Fogarty, Paul Leo, Yaz Yetkin, Çilingir Oğuz, Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi, Afsaneh Naderi Beni, Shahin Yazdani, Evgeny L Akopov, Kai-Yee Toh, Gareth R Howell, Andrew C Orr, Yufen Goh, Wee Yang Meah, Su Qin Peh, Ewa Kosior-Jarecka, Urszula Lukasik, Mandy Krumbiegel, Eranga N Vithana, Tien Yin Wong, Yutao Liu, Allison E Ashley Koch, Pratap Challa, Robyn M Rautenbach, David A Mackey, Alex W Hewitt, Paul Mitchell, Jie Jin Wang, Ari Ziskind, Trevor Carmichael, Rangappa Ramakrishnan, Kalpana Narendran, Rangaraj Venkatesh, Saravanan Vijayan, Peiquan Zhao, Xueyi Chen, Dalia Guadarrama-Vallejo, Ching Yu Cheng, Shamira A Perera, Rahat Husain, Su-Ling Ho, Ulrich-Christoph Welge-Luessen, Christian Mardin, Ursula Schloetzer-Schrehardt, Axel M Hillmer, Stefan Herms, Susanne Moebus, Markus M Nöthen, Nicole Weisschuh, Rohit Shetty, Arkasubhra Ghosh, Yik Ying Teo, Matthew A Brown, Ignacio Lischinsky, Jonathan G Crowston, Michael Coote, Bowen Zhao, Jinghong Sang, Nihong Zhang, Qisheng You, Vera Vysochinskaya, Panayiota Founti, Anthoula Chatzikyriakidou, Alexandros Lambropoulos, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos, Anne L Coleman, M Roy Wilson, Douglas J Rhee, Jae Hee Kang, Inna May-Bolchakova, Steffen Heegaard, Kazuhiko Mori, Wallace L M Alward, Jost B Jonas, Liang Xu, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Balram Chowbay, Elke Schaeffeler, Matthias Schwab, Fabian Lerner, Ningli Wang, Zhenglin Yang, Paolo Frezzotti, Shigeru Kinoshita, John H Fingert, Masaru Inatani, Kei Tashiro, André Reis, Deepak P Edward, Louis R Pasquale, Toshiaki Kubota, Janey L Wiggs, Francesca Pasutto, Fotis Topouzis, Michael Dubina, Jamie E Craig, Nagahisa Yoshimura, Periasamy Sundaresan, Simon W M John, Robert Ritch, Michael A Hauser, Chiea-Chuen Khor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Professor 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2016.
All research outputs
#847,237
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,526
of 7,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,336
of 256,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#42
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.