↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
41 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Resuscitation, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric H. Chou, Eitan Dickman, Po-Yang Tsou, Mark Tessaro, Yang-Ming Tsai, Matthew Huei-Ming, Chien-Chang Lee, John Marshall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 15%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#860,880
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#217
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,610
of 269,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#4
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.