↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of treatment response to liraglutide in type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of treatment response to liraglutide in type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00592-018-1124-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Simioni, C. Berra, M. Boemi, A. C. Bossi, R. Candido, G. Di Cianni, S. Frontoni, S. Genovese, P. Ponzani, V. Provenzano, G. T. Russo, L. Sciangula, A. Lapolla, C. Bette, M. C. Rossi, ReaL (NN2211-4118) Study Group*

Abstract

There is an unmet need among healthcare providers to identify subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes who are most likely to respond to treatment. Data were taken from electronic medical records of participants of an observational, retrospective study in Italy. We used logistic regression models to assess the odds of achieving glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction ≥ 1.0% point after 12-month treatment with liraglutide (primary endpoint), according to various patient-related factors. RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation (RECPAM) analysis was used to identify distinct homogeneous patient subgroups with different odds of achieving the primary endpoint. Data from 1325 patients were included, of which 577 (43.5%) achieved HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0% point (10.9 mmol/mol) after 12 months. Logistic regression showed that for each additional 1% HbA1c at baseline, the odds of reaching this endpoint were increased 3.5 times (95% CI: 2.90-4.32). By use of RECPAM analysis, five distinct responder subgroups were identified, with baseline HbA1c and diabetes duration as the two splitting variables. Patients in the most poorly controlled subgroup (RECPAM Class 1, mean baseline HbA1c > 9.1% [76 mmol/mol]) had a 28-fold higher odds of reaching the endpoint versus patients in the best-controlled group (mean baseline HbA1c ≤ 7.5% [58 mmol/mol]). Mean HbA1c reduction from baseline was as large as - 2.2% (24 mol/mol) in the former versus - 0.1% (1.1 mmol/mol) in the latter. Mean weight reduction ranged from 2.5 to 4.3 kg across RECPAM subgroups. Glycaemic response to liraglutide is largely driven by baseline HbA1c levels and, to a lesser extent, by diabetes duration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,238,035
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#106
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,901
of 332,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.