| Title |
Small Amounts of Gluten in Subjects With Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.01.029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Di Sabatino, Umberto Volta, Chiara Salvatore, Paolo Biancheri, Giacomo Caio, Roberto De Giorgio, Michele Di Stefano, Gino R. Corazza |
| Abstract |
There is debate over the existence of nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) -intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in response to ingestion of gluten-containing foods by people without celiac disease or wheat allergy. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to determine the effects of administration of low doses of gluten to subjects with suspected NCGS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 678 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 224 | 33% |
| Canada | 53 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 2% |
| Australia | 14 | 2% |
| Spain | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| Ireland | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 45 | 7% |
| Unknown | 253 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 522 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 95 | 14% |
| Scientists | 40 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 15% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 22% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 754. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#26,542
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#5
of 4,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222
of 269,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.