↓ Skip to main content

Attention Bias Modification for Anxiety and Phobias: Current Status and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Attention Bias Modification for Anxiety and Phobias: Current Status and Future Directions
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0545-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennie M. Kuckertz, Nader Amir

Abstract

Attention bias modification (ABM) was introduced over a decade ago as a computerized method of manipulating attentional bias and has been followed by intense interest in applying ABM for clinical purposes. While meta-analyses support ABM as a method of modifying attentional biases and reducing anxiety symptoms, there have been notable discrepancies in findings published within the last several years. In this review, we comment on recent research that may help explain some of the inconsistencies across ABM studies. More relevant to the future of ABM research, we highlight areas in which continuing research is needed. We suggest that ABM appears to be a promising treatment for anxiety disorders, but relative to other interventions, ABM is in its infancy. Thus, research is needed in order to improve ABM as a clinical treatment and advance the psychological science of ABM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 18%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,748,987
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#996
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,542
of 352,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.