↓ Skip to main content

Risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients with continued use of low-dose aspirin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients with continued use of low-dose aspirin
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00535-015-1053-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuki Ninomiya, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Soki Nishiyama, Yuzuru Tamaru, Naoki Asayama, Kenjiro Shigita, Nana Hayashi, Kazuaki Chayama

Abstract

Although Japanese guidelines proposed by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors recommend continued use of low-dose aspirin (LDA), this strategy is controversial. It was our practice to interrupt LDA therapy 5-7 days before ESD until December 2010, when we instituted the new guidelines and performed ESD without interrupting LDA therapy. The aim of the present study was to confirm the validity of the noninterrupted use of LDA inpatients undergoing ESD for colorectal tumors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 74%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#926
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,846
of 385,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.