↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: The Case for Routine Maintenance of Dental Implants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Periodontology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: The Case for Routine Maintenance of Dental Implants
Published in
Journal of Periodontology, May 2014
DOI 10.1902/jop.2013.130353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G. Wilson, Pilar Valderrama, Danieli B.C. Rodrigues

Abstract

The large majority of dental implants are successful over the long term. Failure is usually associated with infection, trauma, inflammation, or a combination of these factors. Early identification and appropriate treatment can identify and eliminate these problems in the majority of cases. Thus routine implant maintenance structured along the guidelines for patients with periodontal diseases is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 61%
Engineering 7 9%
Materials Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Periodontology
#1,668
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,704
of 227,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Periodontology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.